學測克漏字題庫年度總覽110年學測 / 第25題

110年學測 克漏字 第25題

時態/語態線索:句內答對率 30%
答對率 30%:當年每 100 位考生,有 30 位答對。 ⚠ 陷阱題,連高分群考生也常答錯

“If he was, the first bolt 25 enough.

  1. (A)was
  2. (B)had been
  3. (C)would be
  4. (D)would have been

答案:(D) would have been

題目編號:G110_25_2(已自動幫你填到回報表單裡)🚩 回報這題有問題

解析

本句是與過去事實相反的假設:「如果上帝真要找我麻煩,第一道雷早就夠了」——事實是他被擊中多次,故主要子句用 would have been;was、had been 不能作主要子句的動詞形式,would be 則指向現在或未來。

重點:與過去事實相反的假設(第三型假設語氣),if子句用had+過去分詞,主要子句用would have+過去分詞
延伸閱讀:第三型假設語氣(與過去事實相反)基本句型 ↗

深入解析

答對率 30%。

你可能會這樣想

看到 If he was,你大概會判定這是單純的過去式條件句。其實這句出自口語,正式寫法是 If he were——口語常用 was 代替 were,但整句仍是假設語氣。判準不在 if 子句,在主要子句。

這是混合條件句

if 子句 If he was(=were)講的是「上帝現在是否在找我麻煩」,屬於與現在事實相反;主要子句 would have been 講的是「當年那第一道雷」,屬於與過去事實相反。兩個子句時間點不同,公式是 If + 過去式/were, 主詞 + would have + p.p.(現在的假設條件 → 過去的結果)。標準例句:If I were a man, they would have given me the job.(假如我是男的,當年那份工作就會給我了)。

本題的事實

說話者被閃電擊中過很多次,他說「如果上帝真要找我麻煩,第一道雷就夠了」——言下之意是他挨了不只一道卻還活著。結果落在過去,所以用 would have been。

接上你已經學過的東西

If I were you, I would…(與現在事實相反,結果也在現在);本題只是把結果挪到過去。

常考字詞與句型

would have + p.p.(與過去事實相反)、If I were you…(假如我是你)、be after sb(找某人麻煩)、be struck by lightning(被閃電擊中)。

數據出處:本頁的答對率來自大考中心公布的官方統計,不是老師自行估算,也不是網路蒐集的印象值。
官方統計總表大考中心 · 學科能力測驗統計資料 ↗(各學年度統計圖表內含「答對率及鑑別度表」)
名詞說明:大考中心《一起來認識學測與指考的試題答對率 ↗》、《一起來認識學測與指考的試題鑑別度 ↗》。
最後核對日期:2026年7月。若連結失效,代表大考中心已調整該頁位置,數據本身不受影響;也歡迎用回報表單 ↗告訴我,我會更新連結。
展開本題所在的整篇文章與中文翻譯
兩者皆是全文中心思想段落主旨句Abc轉折詞

Being hit by lightning is a rare event. Over the course of an 80-year life span, the odds of being hit by lightning are 1 in 3,000, 21 the probability of being struck seven different times. Roy Sullivan, a park ranger in the United States, was struck by lightning more recorded times than any other human being. Over his 36-year career, Sullivan was struck by lightning seven times—and 22 each shock!

Strikes one, two, and three were pure bad luck, he thought. But after strike four, Sullivan became 23 death and took precautions during lightning strikes. Strike five occurred in 1973 when Sullivan was on patrol. A storm cloud "chased" him until he was struck. The same thing happened again in 1976. Sullivan, while surveying a campground, felt that a cloud was 24 him, and tried all he could to run— but it got him anyway.

Finally, on 25 June 1977, a seventh and final bolt struck Sullivan as he was fishing in a pond. "I don't believe God is after me," he theorized. "If he was, the first bolt 25 enough. Best I can figure is that I have some chemical, some mineral, in my body that draws lightning. I just wish I knew."

中譯:被閃電擊中是相當罕見的事件。以80年的人生來計算,被閃電擊中一次的機率是三千分之一,而被擊中七次的機率更是微乎其微。美國公園管理員羅伊·蘇利文,是有紀錄以來被閃電擊中次數最多的人。在他36年的職涯中,蘇利文一共被閃電擊中七次——而且每次都活了下來!他認為前三次純粹是運氣不好。但在第四次被擊中之後,蘇利文開始對死亡感到恐懼,並在雷雨時採取預防措施。第五次擊中發生在1973年,當時蘇利文正在巡邏,一朵雷雨雲彷彿「追著」他跑,直到他被擊中為止。1976年同樣的事情再次發生:蘇利文在勘查一處露營地時,感覺有一朵雲正在跟蹤他,他想盡辦法逃跑——但閃電還是擊中了他。最後,在1977年6月的某一天,第七次也是最後一次的雷擊,在他於池塘釣魚時擊中了他。「我不認為是上帝在跟我作對,」他這樣推測道,「如果真是這樣,第一次雷擊就足以解決我了。我猜想,大概是我體內含有某種化學物質或礦物質,特別容易吸引閃電。我真希望能知道原因。」
📋 段落大意(1 段)
  1. Park ranger Roy Sullivan uniquely survived seven separate lightning strikes over his career, leading him to speculate why he attracted storms.(敘事文)
到互動練習站線上作答 →