Mary: 33 I told her my parents were coming for a visit and I needed the room.
答案：(C) Well, I lied to her.
Mary 先給結論「呃，我跟她說謊了」，然後解釋謊言內容（說父母要來訪需要房間），這是先給結論再解釋細節的對話邏輯；I got no clue.（跟後面立刻解釋矛盾）、Well done.（答非所問）、It's none of your business.（跟後面主動解釋的語氣矛盾）都不合。
本題大考中心未公布逐題答對率，以下不談數據，只談觀念。
Jane 問「你是怎麼把她弄走的」，你會直覺去找一句「回答方法」的話，但四個選項裡沒有一句直接講方法——因為方法寫在空格後面。空格要填的是那個方法前面的一句話。
這一格的證據特別硬，而且有兩層，都在空格後面。第一層：空格緊接著就是 I told her my parents were coming for a visit and I needed the room.（我跟她說我爸媽要來，我需要那個房間。）這是一句解釋，而解釋前面必須先有一個結論讓它去解釋。第二層更決定性：再下一句 Mary 說 I felt bad about it, though.（不過我對這件事覺得很過意不去。）這個 it 指的是什麼？只能是「說謊」這件事——如果空格不是坦承說謊，it 就沒有東西可指，整句話會懸空。用回指反推，答案只剩 Well, I lied to her.（呃，我對她說謊了。）：先給結論（我說謊了），再說謊話的內容，最後補一句心裡不安，三句話一氣呵成。
I got no clue.（我也不知道）：與後面立刻給出的詳細說明直接矛盾——不知道的人不會馬上把自己怎麼做的講得一清二楚。Well done.（做得好）：這是稱讚別人的話，而 Jane 問的是 Mary 自己做了什麼。It’s none of your business.（不關你的事）：拒絕回答，但 Mary 下一句就主動把細節全說了，語氣自相矛盾。
lie to sb（對某人說謊）、feel bad about（對……感到過意不去）、come for a visit（來訪）、have no clue（毫無頭緒）、It’s none of your business.（不關你的事）、Well done.（做得好）。
Jane: Hi, Mary. It's been a while. How are you? Mary: OK, I guess. 31
Jane: Couldn't be better. By the way, is your house guest still staying with you?
Mary: No. After three weeks, she finally left. 32
Jane: So, how did you get rid of her? Mary: 33 I told her my parents were coming for a visit and I needed the room. I felt bad about it, though. 34
Jane: Oh, I'd have told her to leave after one week. That reminds me. My father-in-law is coming to visit us next week. Can I move in with you for a few days? Mary: 35
Jane: Please!